Sergey Sayenko, international commentator; Dmitry Verkhoturov, expert, Centre of Modern Afghanistan What can sco do for Afghanistan? / SCO Shanghai Cooperation Organization

The website has been created with the financial assistance

of the Federal Agency for Press and Mass Communications

of the Russian Federation

Make Infoshos my homepageContact usAdd to FavoritesHome
 
Member States:
20:48Astana
20:48Bishkek
20:18Delhi
22:48Beijing
18:48Moscow
19:48Islamabad
19:48Dushanbe
19:48Tashkent
Observer States:
19:18Tehran
17:48Minsk
22:48Ulan-Bator
19:18Kabul
::
19:18Yerevan
20:18Katmandu
17:48Ankara
21:48Phnom Penh
20:18Sri Dzhayavardenepura Kotte

SCO Currencies/Ruble

 
 
Country Code Currency Den. Rate
 
 

The official rate of the Central Bank of Russia

News

13.09.2018 12:58
The Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation will take part in the First China International Import Expo
01.08.2018 15:22
British press intimidate public opinion
08.06.2018 16:27
Customs services of the SCO member states are expanding cooperation
08.06.2018 16:23
Russia celebrates the 75th anniversary of victory in Battle of Stalingrad
08.06.2018 16:21
International Reconstruction Fund is vital for Syria
08.06.2018 15:51
Sergei Shoigu urged the SCO to create tools against the penetration of terrorism
08.06.2018 15:48
The SCO and the United Nations are interested in strengthening anti-terrorist cooperation
08.06.2018 15:38
Co-operation of Russia and China in agriculture will increase
15.05.2018 15:31
Theresa May sacrificed Salisbury for her political ambitions
12.04.2018 11:22
A a mousetrap for Theresa May
 
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    
             
SCO Secretariat SCO Business Council The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure Of SCO SCO Interbank Consortium
What can sco do for Afghanistan?
07.12.2017 13:40 Sergey Sayenko, international commentator; Dmitry Verkhoturov, expert, Centre of Modern Afghanistan

On October 11, 2017, Moscow hosted a meeting of the SCO-Afghanistan Contact Group at the level of deputy foreign ministers.

The Contact Group was established in 2005 in order to develop recommendations and proposals on counteracting terrorism and the drug threat and to assist Kabul with economic affairs and reconciliation within the country.

Although the format was not frozen, no consultations were held after 2009. The reason was the pressure Washington put on Afghanistans authorities. However, after the bulk of the US troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan in 2014 and the aid programs and financing were cut down, the country began looking for new partners. In 2015, Kabul applied for admission to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. And last summer, when Russia initiated resumption of contacts in the SCO-Afghanistan format, the Afghan party was engaging readily.

At the SCO summit in Astana in June 2017, it was decided that the groups activities should be adjusted due to the Organizations expansion. At the Moscow meeting, which was chaired by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister I. Morgulov, the participants exchanged opinions on the ways to fight the security challenges and threats in the region, to support Afghanistan in its efforts to restore a peaceful, stable and prosperous country. The participants unanimously emphasized the need to further deepen interaction between the SCO and Afghanistan within the advisory mechanism in order to achieve the stated goals.

One of the key topics discussed at the event was movement of ISIS militants (ISIS is an organization prohibited in Russia) from Syria and Iraq to Afghanistan and on to Central Asia and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Area of China. The problem worries both Russia and China. Representatives of Iran and Turkmenistan, which are not SCO members, but are interested in resolving the issue, also took part in the discussion.

Afghanistan, in its turn, continues to actively seek membership in the SCO. The countrys Deputy Foreign Minister Hekmat Karzai said at the meeting that other countries should support Afghanistans full membership in the SCO and that his the country should become a permanent co-chair of the Contact Group.

Zamir Kabulov, head of the 2nd Asian department of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said that Russia supported Afghanistans efforts to join the SCO. The country has to work hard to achieve this goal, but Russia is willing to support it along the way, he said. We proposed to more actively unlock the potential of interaction between the Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure of the SCO and Afghanistan, and Afghanistan accepted our proposal and expressed readiness to work actively to achieve this, said Bakhtiyor Khakimov, the Russian Presidents envoy for SCO affairs. Kabul is willing to participate in transport infrastructure projects, and develop cooperation with the SCO in education and personnel training, the diplomat said. The Russian party suggested taking advantage of the opportunities of the SCO University and establishing contacts with the SCO Youth Council, Khakimov added.

Meanwhile, Afghanistan is reported to be witnessing a real low-intensity war between several forces: the government of the Islamic Republic supported by the US troops on the one hand and the Taliban and ISIS forces competing with it, on the other.

John Sopko, US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, recently released a report on the situation in the country as of October-November 2017. The government of Afghanistan controls 56.8% of the countrys territory, 231 districts out of 407. Militants control 13.3% of the territory, or 54 districts. The remaining 122 districts are disputed territory, where it is unclear who gets the upper hand. Control means that the government or militants have full and unchallenged power in an area. Districts where the power keeps shifting were classified as disputed territory.

According to Sopko, militants have footholds in the provinces of Urozgan and Helmand in the southern part of Afghanistan (in this area, the government troops control only a narrow strip along the Kandagar-Herat highway and around big cities), and in the province of Kunduz in the north. Some militant bases are scattered in the mountainous and hard-to-access areas of the country, and it is difficult to oust them therefrom, even with aviation and superior manpower and weapons.

War has been going on like this for many years already, its nature never changing. In a certain sense, the armed conflict has entered a stable phase, when none of the parties is able to win a decisive victory. The government and the Taliban can wage a war like this for many years and even decades to come, until one party runs out of resources.

Apparently, Washington has realized the failure of its policy in Afghanistan and, instead of encouraging a political dialog, decided to increase the number of troops deployed to 16,000 people. This is one of the components of the new Afghanistan strategy of President Donald Trump, which also includes mounting political pressure on Pakistan. At the same time, the United States and NATO have turned down any cooperation with Russia and the SCO on the subject of Afghanistan.

What can SCO member states do in these circumstances to settle the Afghan conflict? Let us consider different options. Use of force is out of the question, because the SCO is not a military structure. Besides, such intervention would put the SCO against the United States, which has troops deployed in Afghanistan in accordance with the bilateral security agreement.

Offer of military or military-technical assistance to Afghanistan from the SCO would most probably be rejected. Even if the Afghan government wanted to upgrade its weapons and equipment with the help of Russia, the US strongly opposes the idea. It made an exception only for MI-171 helicopters and free supply of weapons.

Participation in peace talks, attempts to persuade the Taliban to start negotiations with the government and other political initiatives to encourage and promote the process of negotiations have not yielded any result after many years.

In such circumstances, economics could become the focus area. The SCO has already helped Afghanistan to create almost 70,000 jobs in rural areas. On the other hand, investment projects depend on success in the security sphere and the good will of the Afghan government towards investors from the SCO. As long as the US continues instigating war in the country, it will be difficult to make large investments there, and even the Chinese transport initiative, One Belt, One Road, will bypass Afghanistan.

Therefore, the SCOs entire potential for influencing the situation in Afghanistan may currently not be enough to resolve its complicated problems. We can state that the country is very dependent on the US, which hinders development of its partnership with the SCO.

Whose strategy that of Trump or the SCO will be preferred by Afghanistan itself? Obviously, Americas 16-year military presence in the country has not resolved its security problems, but rather escalated them. This is why Kabul now vests big hopes in Moscow and Beijing. All the more so, as the example of Syria has shown the Afghans that Russia is really able to fight international terrorism.

  • Add Comment
  • Print

Leave a comment

*
*
*
 

More

SCO Secretary-General meets with President of Afghanistan Ashraf Ghani
13.06.2017 09:14
The challenge of peacekeeping in Afghan
25.05.2016 18:31
US withdrawal from Afghanistan: Z hour for entire region
25.03.2015 16:10
US withdrawal from Afghanistan: Z hour for entire region
20.03.2015 16:07
What SCO can do to solve Afghan puzzle
05.09.2014 13:00
What will happen to Centra l Asia after allies will leave Afghanistan?
26.06.2012 12:01
What Afghanistan is for the SCO and what is the SCO for Afghanistan?
14.06.2012 10:00
SCO is a snapshot of equitable world
03.05.2012 10:00
Putin: NATO cargo transit through Ulyanovsk not contrary to our national interests
12.04.2012 14:31
Iran: holy war on afghan drugs
16.03.2012 12:43

Comments(0)

.