Alexander Vorontsov, head of the Korea segment, the Institute of Oriental Studies, the Russian Acade Elimination of North Korea remains Americas strategic goal / SCO Shanghai Cooperation Organization

The website has been created with the financial assistance

of the Federal Agency for Press and Mass Communications

of the Russian Federation

Make Infoshos my homepageContact usAdd to FavoritesHome
Member States:
Observer States:
07:48Phnom Penh
06:18Sri Dzhayavardenepura Kotte

SCO Currencies/Ruble

Country Code Currency Den. Rate

The official rate of the Central Bank of Russia


18.12.2017 11:46
US President threatens to "incinerate" North Korea
29.11.2017 14:44
Rashid Alimov has a meeting with Shamshad Akhtar in Bangkok
28.11.2017 14:45
SCO-ESCAP relations enter a new stage
27.11.2017 14:46
Rashid Alimov: Economic cooperation is a key priority for SCO at the new development stage. The SCO Secretary-General delivers an address at the ESCAP
24.11.2017 14:51
SCO information stand installed in Bangkok
22.11.2017 14:51
SCO and UN to step up cooperation in preventive diplomacy
16.11.2017 21:19
Trump called all countries to break off trade ties with the DPRK
16.11.2017 20:39
China did not confirm Trump's words about refusing "two frosts" on the Korean Peninsula
16.11.2017 20:08
"Cold war" in the 21st century is impossible political scientist
14.11.2017 21:24
Medvedev: Russia is interested in Peaceful Settlement of Korean Question
SCO Secretariat SCO Business Council The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure Of SCO SCO Interbank Consortium
Elimination of North Korea remains Americas strategic goal
07.12.2017 13:23 Alexander Vorontsov, head of the Korea segment, the Institute of Oriental Studies, the Russian Acade
Elimination of North Korea remains Americas strategic goal

Korea was one of the central topics of US President Donald Trumps lengthy tour of East Asia and his meetings with the leaders of Japan, South Korea, China and other countries. Observers are already used to Mr Trumps peculiar manner of speaking, full of contradictory and metaphorical statements. Oppositely directed signals he sent from different capitals do not make it possible to understand the line of action towards North Korea currently chosen by the Republican administration and if the White House has a strategy in this area at all.

This time, the president did not voice any direct calls for a military operation or threats to destroy North Korea, which the world had heard many times before. However, during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on November 6, the American guest said that the era of strategic patience and soft-bodied diplomacy towards Pyongyang, which allowed North Koreans to develop nuclear weapons, was over and the US had moved on to tough actions.

One day later, in Seoul, where he was met by protests of proponents of peace in Korea and where South Korean President Moon Jae-in repeatedly and firmly spoke against military scenarios of settling the current crisis, Mr Trump chose a different tone and even called on North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to come to the negotiating table. In Beijing, the US president tried to exert maximum pressure to persuade the Chinese leaders to further toughen sanctions and fully join Washingtons policy of building an impenetrable economic blockade against North Korea. It looks, however, like Mr Trump failed to achieve his main goal, which was to obtain Beijings silent consent to a US military operation against North Korea and secure Chinas non-interference in an armed conflict.

Speaking at the South Korean parliament, the American leader painted North Korea as black as possible, a terrible and intolerable tyranny, a prison for the entire nation, but already on November 12, he twitted that he hoped to become friends with Kim Jong-un.

The analysis of statements made by Mr Trump and the outcome of his meetings is definitely important, but it is even more important to assess the practical steps taken by his administration. Here, the situation remains quite alarming. Large-scale joint US South Korean military maneuvers near the North Korean border are going non stop. November 11-14 saw the biggest naval exercise of the decade involving three (!) US carrier groups and 7 South Korean vessels.

Sentiments of the public and political circles in the US and South Korea are contrasting. Attitudes in the south of the Korean Peninsula are dominated by general calm and belief that the White House will not dare to strike against North Korea, but it is very different on the opposite side of the Pacific. Korea experts both in the US and other countries are seriously concerned about how elaborately the US is developing a military operation against Pyongyang and how openly these plans are being discussed by US officials. Former CIA chief John Brennan estimates the probability of war against North Korea at 20%-25%, while former diplomat and leading Korea scholar at the John Hopkins University Joel Wit puts it at 40%, and Richard Haas, president of the Council on Foreign Relations of the US Department of State, at 50%.

Most analysts are correct when they describe the current military and political situation in Korea as the most explosive since the Pueblo crisis of 1969 or even since the end of the Korean war in 1953. The fundamental reason for the permanent conflict in the peninsula is well known: unregulated relations between the United States and North Korea; Washingtons stubborn unwillingness to improve relations with Pyongyang, including its diplomatic recognition, to bring the Korean war to a close. In reality, the US strategic goal is still elimination of North Korea by some or other means. At least, this is how the situation is viewed in Pyongyang.

Korea experts remember Pyongyangs persistent efforts to get the US to answer the following question: if guarantees given by the US president were valid only during his time in office and are easily cancelled by his successor, could the US Congress act as a more reliable guarantor, adopting a law that would be binding both for the incumbent leader and for presidents to come? There was no answer. North Koreans once again saw that the only reliable guarantee in the present unfair world was their national force of nuclear deterrence.

Given this background, many countries are beginning to express increasing worry about the safety of the forthcoming Winter Olympic Games in Pyeongchang. South Korean hosts are concerned about the potential decline of the tourist traffic. This, however, does not seem to bother Seouls allies in Washington.

  • Add Comment
  • Print

Leave a comment



SCO Secretary-General Rashid Alimovs visit to Kazakhstan: Meeting with Foreign Minister Kairat Abdrakhmanov
25.08.2017 18:20
SCO-UNESCAP partnership elevated to entirely new level: Expanding international transportation cooperation
05.07.2017 14:07
SCO Secretary-General meets with Uzbekistani Ambassador on the conclusion of his mission in China
04.07.2017 14:05
SCO Observer Mission monitors Senate elections in Kazakhstan
29.06.2017 16:14
SCO Secretary-General: The road to peace and prosperity lies in building a safe and stable environment on a vast territory between three oceans, and
29.06.2017 14:25
SCO Secretary-General: Since this day, the state flags of eight SCO member states fly around the emerald-blue flag of the Shanghai Cooperation Organi
16.06.2017 14:46
Rashid Alimov: Leaders of SCO member states in Astana once again called on the world to join efforts in countering todays challenges and threats
12.06.2017 11:21
Press release on the results of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Heads of State Council Meeting
09.06.2017 11:19
SCO promotes transport links
06.06.2017 14:10
Astanas nuclear-free shield
15.02.2015 11:29